Taylor Swift turned the topic of a whole article attempting to determine if she was a part of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood … and apparently, folks in her world are fairly pissed about it.

The NYT lately printed an op-ed by author Anna Marks — who identifies as queer — and it is titled, “Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do.” All the premise of the piece is a deep dive into hypothesis that TS would possibly, maybe, be one thing aside from straight.

Marks refers to moments she perceives as Taylor “dropping hairpins” (aka, dropping clues about being LGBTQ+) all through her profession … writing, “In isolation, a single dropped hairpin is probably meaningless or unintentional, however thought of collectively, they’re the unfurling of a ballerina bun after an extended efficiency.”

She provides, “These dropped hairpins started to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry lengthy earlier than queer id was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They recommend to queer people who she is certainly one of us.” If it feels like a attain, Taylor’s camp appears to really feel the identical means.

Whereas Taylor has definitely confirmed herself to be ally to the LGBTQ+ neighborhood, she’s by no means explicitly indicated she’s into something however dudes — in reality, her courting file proves that.

That time was hit dwelling by somebody near Taylor, who advised CNN … “Due to her huge success, on this second there’s a Taylor-shaped gap in folks’s ethics. This text wouldn’t have been allowed to be written about Shawn Mendes or any male artist whose sexuality has been questioned by followers.”

This particular person provides, “There appears to be no boundary some journalists gained’t cross when writing about Taylor, no matter how invasive, unfaithful, and inappropriate it’s — all below the protecting veil of an ‘opinion piece.’”

There have, in reality, been assume items written about male pop stars and their sexuality … specifically, Harry Kinds, Unhealthy Bunny, and so forth. However this level is effectively taken — simply go away it’s, folks.

You may clearly be supportive of queer folks with out essentially being queer your self.