Justine Bateman appears like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have turned enjoying the “victims” into an Olympic sport.

The “Household Ties” alum slammed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in a brand new put up shared to Substack over the weekend, which she titled, “The Downside With Meghan Markle: It’s Not What She’s Doing, It’s the Sufferer Olympics Highway She Took to Get There.”

“The issue with Meghan Markle (and her husband, Harry) is that each alternative they’ve explored or exploited over the previous few years has been resulting from their very aggressive Sufferer Olympics marketing campaign,” Bateman wrote.

Bateman, 59, argued that there’s an “immense” distinction in performing that method “two years in the past and doing it now” — years after they left the UK and stepped down as working members of the royal household.

“It’s 2025, and nobody needs to see victims anymore,” she wrote. “Nobody needs to observe somebody playact at one thing they didn’t earn. Nobody needs to go together with one other’s ‘narrative’ anymore.”

Bateman, who even created a customized gold medal with “Sufferer Olympics” written on the ribbon, went over a number of the accusations Meghan and Harry have made concerning the royals –– together with that somebody allegedly questioned their son’s pores and skin colour and that they have been “not being protected” from media narratives.

“Meghan and Harry has the luck of societal timing with their cries of abuse by the hands of others. 2020-2024 was actually the Sufferer Olympics Period,” she quipped.

The “Violet” creator wrote that the “gold medals” they gained embrace their $100 million cope with Netflix, a reported $20 million four-book cope with Penguin Random Home and Markle’s now-defunct $20 million cope with Spotify.

“The e-book deal was not as a result of Harry is an unimaginable author, the Spotify deal was not as a result of both of them are stunning orators or fascinating interviewers, and the Netflix deal was not as a result of they’re notable showrunners or producers,” she claimed. “These have been merely the spoils of them crying out to anybody who would pay attention concerning the ‘accidents’ that they had sustained.”

Nevertheless, Bateman cautioned the couple that they now need to “earn [their] spot,” as a result of it’s been 5 years since folks started listening to their story.

“The general public doesn’t wish to take heed to individuals who bemoaned their lack of privateness, and but take each alternative to be extraordinarily public with no matter they’re doing,” she wrote.

“They’re bored with seeing a pair who hated the Royal Household a lot that they burned the bridge between them to ashes, solely to ferociously cling to the titles that they had as former members of that Royal Household.”

Bateman summarized her put up by arguing that Markle, 43, and Harry, 40, have been “using the fumes of a previous Sufferer Period, in a brand new period now the place victimhood has fallen far out of favor.”

“I imagine everybody has a basket of abilities and abilities. I don’t imagine both Meghan or Harry has taken the time to find what’s of their baskets,” she concluded. “In the event that they have been to take a while away, to complement themselves and uncover who they honestly are, I feel some fascinating issues might emerge from them.”

Reps for Harry and Markle didn’t return Web page Six’s requests for remark.

Bateman is not any stranger to sharing her robust opinions of Markle and Harry, nevertheless. She beforehand criticized them for serving to victims of the Los Angeles wildfires in January.

“Meghan Markle and Harry aren’t any higher than ambulance chasers,” she wrote by way of X on Jan. 11. “What a repulsive ‘photograph op’ they achieved. They’re ‘touring the injury’? Are they politicians now? They don’t reside right here; they’re vacationers. Catastrophe Vacationers. #PalisadesFire.”

A supply later defended Markle and Harry’s activism and clapped again at Bateman for her “offensive” response.

“It’s offensive to Meghan and Harry that anyone would suppose that is merely a photograph alternative,” an insider informed us in January.

The supply identified that Markle — who moved to Montecito, Calif., with Harry and their two kids, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet in 2020 — was “born and raised in Los Angeles so that is, and at all times will probably be, residence to her.”

“They’ve additionally devoted numerous hours to volunteering, lengthy earlier than the media even caught wind of their involvement,” the insider stated, noting that the couple additionally “donated cash and important objects.”